I noticed that you used amenity=resuse. According to taginfo [1], it is now used 19 times, most of them in Brussels. Would you mind documenting it on the wiki and explaining the meaning of this tag ? Otherwise part of your work might be hard to understand for data consumers.
regards m [1] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=reuse On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Julien Fastré <jul...@fastre.info> wrote: > +1 : > > - this was an interesting meeting : a lot of new contributors, very > interested in OSM and the topic they were handling. > - we should have prepared the data and mapping before. A lot of things > are missing in term of existing tag and I see an opportunity to make our > databaser more rich ; > - Dewey is interested in OSM and will consider adapting their categories > to our tagging system; I think we have a lot of gain in helping them. > > This is a map of the most thing that were mapped since saturday morning > : [1], and the overpass query is there : > https://gist.github.com/julienfastre/c538a3983c6f8e133906 /!\ but it may > happen that some things are missing !!! /!\ > > Julien > > > > [1] > http://overpass-turbo.eu/map.html?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A50%5D%3B%0A%2F%2F%20fetch%20area%20%E2%80%9CBelgium%E2%80%9D%20to%20search%20in%0Aarea(3602404020)-%3E.searchArea%3B%0A%2F%2F%20gather%20results%0A(%0A%20%20%2F%2F%20query%20part%20for%3A%20%E2%80%9Cdrinking%20water%E2%80%9D%0A%20%20node%5B%22amenity%22%3D%22drinking_water%22%5D(area.searchArea)%3B%0A%20%20way%5B%22amenity%22%3D%22drinking_water%22%5D(area.searchArea)%3B%0A)-%3E.d%3B%0A%0A%2F%2F%20filter%20since%2010%20UTC%0A(%0Anode.d(changed%3A%222016-02-27T00%3A00%3A00Z%22)%3B%0Away.d(changed%3A%222016-02-27T00%3A00%3A00Z%22)%3B%0A)%20-%3E.drinking%3B%0A%0A%0A(%0A%20%20%2F%2F%20query%20part%20for%3A%20%E2%80%9Csocial%20facility%E2%80%9D%0A%20%20node%5B%22amenity%22%3D%22social_facility%22%5D(area.searchArea)%3B%0A%20%20way%5B%22amenity%22%3D%22social_facility%22%5D(area.searchArea)%3B%0A)-%3E.s%3B%0A%0A%2F%2F%20filter%20modified%20since%2010%20UTC%0A(%0A%20%20node.s(changed%3A%222016-02-27T00%3A00%3A00Z%22)%3B%0Away.s(changed%3A%222016-02-27T00%3A00%3A00Z%22)%3B%0A%20%20)-%3E.social%3B%0A%0A(%0A%20%20%2F%2F%20query%20part%20for%3A%20%E2%80%9Camenity%20%3D%20reuse%E2%80%9D%0A%20%20node%5B%22amenity%22%3D%22reuse%22%5D(area.searchArea)%3B%0A%20%20way%5B%22amenity%22%3D%22reuse%22%5D(area.searchArea)%3B%0A)-%3E.r%3B%0A%0A%2F%2F%20filter%20modified%20since%2010%20UTC%0A(%0A%20%20node.r(changed%3A%222016-02-27T00%3A00%3A00Z%22)%3B%0A%20%20way.r(changed%3A%222016-02-27T00%3A00%3A00Z%22)%3B%0A%20%20)-%3E.reuse%3B%0A%0A(%0A%20%20%2F%2F%20query%20part%20for%20second%20hand%20shops%0A%20%20%20%20node%5B%22second_hand%22~%22yes%7Conly%22%5D(area.searchArea)%3B%0A%20%20%09way%5B%22second_hand%22~%22yes%7Conly%22%5D(area.searchArea)%3B%0A%20%20)-%3E.m%3B%0A%0A(%0A%20%20node.m(changed%3A%222016-02-27T00%3A00%3A00Z%22)%3B%0A%20%20way.m(changed%3A%222016-02-27T00%3A00%3A00Z%22)%3B%0A%20%20)-%3E.shops%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%0A%20%20%20(%20node.social%3B%20way.social%3B%20node.drinking%3B%20way.drinking%3B%20node.reuse%3B%20way.reuse%3B%20way.shops%3B%20node.shops%3B)%3B%20%20%20%20%0A%0A%2F%2F%20print%20results%0Aout%20body%3B%0A%3E%3B%0Aout%20skel%20qt%3B > > Le 28/02/16 09:16, Jo a écrit : >> I think the mapping party yesterday was quite a success. Still it could have >> been better, if we had been able to preview and preprocess the data. I added >> links to the Google Spreadsheet that open JOSM in the right spot now, but >> it's a bit "after the fact" > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1S8-iYBLkmckprwQzetjzFn98I9ai1v2GZAYZLtHTbA4/edit#gid=1796817314 >> > I had to use some 'magic' regular expressions incantations to > separate French from Dutch descriptions and to attempt to split the > addresses. They don't all follow the same structure, so this didn't work > very well. If we do this again, it would be better to have separate > columns for each potential tag we may want to use. > > Unfortunately I > was not able to answer most of the questions I got. It's a difficult > theme to start with and I feel our tagging is lacking a bit once you > want to go into specifics or when facilities fall in several categories > at once. > > On the one hand I think the participants did a great job, > but now it's important to have QC on their work, as we had to improvise > quite often. > > In the Google Docs spreadsheet, I added the tags I > believe we should have used, but if you use the links I created, you'll > find those are not always the ones that were used. > > I think, now it's > quite convenient to jump into the map, using those "Open in JOSM" links. > Are there contributors who want to have a look at them? > > Cheers, > > > Polyglot > > 2016-02-24 9:03 GMT+01:00 Julien Fastré <jul...@fastre.info > <mailto:jul...@fastre.info>>: > > >> Hi, >> >> Le 24/02/16 03:47, joost schouppe a écrit : >> > One hour is definitely enough IMHO, if you can focus on a limited >> number of tasks. For the Missing >> Maps, we have less than half an hour + a paper starters guide. I can >> send you the English version. >> I am really interested in your presentation ! >> >> Julien >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be > mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > <mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
