I know I mapped the place in detail, but I hoped people would mention what they would map without looking at the map :-)
I stopped mapping house numbers ( I have collected more than 20.000 by hand according to Pascal Neis :-) ), as they are imported via CRAB at the moment and maybe later this year via a GRB import (with the buildings). That's why I turned to other stuff. I've heard pro's and con's for separate sidewalks & cycleways. I don't separate them as long as there is no physical barrier (hedge, guard rail, ditch,...) I'll try to map sidewalk=... or cycleway=... on the road though. I'll have a closer look at the TIA sign m. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Gerard Vanderveken <g...@ghia.eu> wrote: > Hi, > > Checking on the map, learns me that most items are already thoroughly mapped > (street cabinets, bins, advertising, lanes, crossings,...) > Things lacking, but not derivable from the photo are the division of > buildings and the corresponding addresses of the buildings. > IMO addresses are of more importance then the little street furniture and > should get more priority in mapping. > Not meaning, that I don't appreciate these mappings, every added object > counts! > > When you have lot of time, you could also map the separated footwalk and > bicycle paths, but this is advanced stuff, and I don't recommend it, as it > is not so easy to make a correct separation and have all options for > connections and resulting in no foot etc on the main highway itself, so that > routing programs for bike and foot will always select the correct paths. If > not done well, it makes more clutter then making things real or clear. > It seems these paths are already good and sufficient tagged in the map. > > So, in short, at first sight, not much extra to map from the photo. > (I assume the sign to TIA is simply a direction and not part of a (tourist) > route, which would imply a missing relation for some bicycle route/network) > > Regards, > Gerard. > > Marc Gemis wrote: > >> I wonder whether we could learn to see/map more by looking at each >> other's survey pictures. Would it allow novices to "see more" ? Let's >> try out >> I know the mailing list does not allow to include pictures, so you >> have to do it with a link >> >> What could/would you map when you look at [1] ? What would you >> investigate further ? >> >> Feel free to answer in French/German/English or Dutch >> >> p.s. Feel free to look at the other pictures at the site [2] and map >> anything you want :-) Under the picture you'll find a (i) which shows >> a map when you click it >> >> >> ---- Nederlands ---- >> >> Ik vraag me af of we van elkaar kunnen leren als we kijken naar de >> foto's die we maken tijdens een survey ? Zou het helpen om >> (beginnende) mappers meer te leren zien ? Laat ons het eens >> uitproberen. Jammer genoeg laat de mailing list niet toe om foto's toe >> te voegen, dus moet je het met een link stellen >> >> Wat zou je kunnen mappen, of wat map je gewoonlijk als je [1] bekijkt >> ? Wat zou je van nader bij gaan bekijken ? >> >> >> p.s. Het staat je vrij om naar de andere foto's op de site [2] te >> kijken en om het even wat te mappen dat je erop ziet :-) Onder de foto >> staat een (i), als je daarop klikt, zie je een kaartje. >> >> >> >> >> [1] >> https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-06-09-Wilrijk/i-b8Xdd5g/0/O/DSC_3228.jpg >> [2] gallery: >> https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-06-09-Wilrijk/i-b8Xdd5g >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
