I could use beta (power) testers willing to listen to me for 15 minutes
on how to go about certain problems, things that I assume before hitting
the upload-josm button etc.

Could also use someone do document key's / values , probably need to ask
me plenty of questions which I will respond.  At the moment the tool is
actually working, I could consider this beta 1.

There are still some translations (key values) that need to be done
better, some don't really have a easy solution, but we'll have to
discuss this.

According to Marc you do need a wide screen right now, I will sort out
some of the visual/behavior later(CSS)

What we could use as well is people who want to edit the wiki on this
(know-how), someone that is capable of making a nice wiki page.  I will
jump on completing information once it's there, I'm quite busy trying to
get more functionality in the tool.

If you want to help on the code base, you should have some javascript
skills (all the work is done in the browser on openlayers), the vectors
come from postgis database I've setup from GRB data.

Please send me a mail if you want to join me.  We also need to work on a
case for approval, this tool will help a lot but it needs more docs/wiki
food.

Glenn


https://github.com/gplv2/grb2pgsql/


> 
> Gerard, addresses are indeed important. Glenn needs beta testers for
> adding them from CRAB/AGIV. I'm rather busy with improving JOSM to map
> public transport, so I'm not getting around to it to test his work, but
> he's making great progress.
> Soon, it should become possible for everybody who uses JOSM to map those
> public transport routes and if they get broken by changes to the
> underlying infrastructure, to figure out how to fix them with as little
> effort as possible.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jo
> 
> 
> 
> 2016-07-01 15:31 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com
> <mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com>>:
> 
>     I know I mapped the place in detail, but I hoped people would mention
>     what they would map without looking at the map :-)
> 
>     I stopped mapping house numbers ( I have collected more than 20.000 by
>     hand according to Pascal Neis :-)  ), as they are imported via CRAB at
>     the moment and maybe later this year via a GRB import (with the
>     buildings).
>     That's why I turned to other stuff.
> 
>     I've heard pro's and con's for separate sidewalks & cycleways. I don't
>     separate them as long as there is no physical barrier (hedge, guard
>     rail, ditch,...)
>     I'll try to map sidewalk=... or cycleway=... on the road though.
> 
>     I'll have a closer look at the TIA sign
> 
>     m.
> 
>     On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Gerard Vanderveken <g...@ghia.eu
>     <mailto:g...@ghia.eu>> wrote:
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > Checking on the map, learns me that most items are already
>     thoroughly mapped
>     > (street cabinets, bins, advertising, lanes, crossings,...)
>     > Things lacking, but not derivable from the photo are the division of
>     > buildings and the corresponding addresses of the buildings.
>     > IMO addresses are of more importance then the little street
>     furniture and
>     > should get more priority in mapping.
>     > Not meaning, that I don't appreciate these mappings, every added
>     object
>     > counts!
>     >
>     > When you have lot of time, you could also map the separated
>     footwalk and
>     > bicycle paths, but this is advanced stuff, and I don't recommend
>     it, as it
>     > is not so easy to make a correct separation and have all options for
>     > connections and resulting in no foot etc on the main highway
>     itself, so that
>     > routing programs for bike and foot will always select the correct
>     paths. If
>     > not done well, it makes more clutter then making things real or clear.
>     > It seems these paths are already good and sufficient tagged in the
>     map.
>     >
>     > So, in short, at first sight, not much extra to map from the photo.
>     > (I assume the sign to TIA is simply a direction and not part of a
>     (tourist)
>     > route, which would imply a missing relation for some bicycle
>     route/network)
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     > Gerard.
>     >
>     > Marc Gemis wrote:
>     >
>     >> I wonder whether we could learn to see/map more by looking at each
>     >> other's survey pictures. Would it allow novices to "see more" ? Let's
>     >> try out
>     >> I know the mailing list does not allow to include pictures, so you
>     >> have to do it with a link
>     >>
>     >> What could/would you map when you look at [1] ? What would you
>     >> investigate further ?
>     >>
>     >> Feel free to answer in French/German/English or Dutch
>     >>
>     >> p.s. Feel free to look at the other pictures at the site [2] and map
>     >> anything you want :-) Under the picture you'll find a (i) which shows
>     >> a map when you click it
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> ---- Nederlands ----
>     >>
>     >> Ik vraag me af of we van elkaar kunnen leren als we kijken naar de
>     >> foto's die we maken tijdens een survey ? Zou het helpen om
>     >> (beginnende) mappers meer te leren zien ? Laat ons het eens
>     >> uitproberen. Jammer genoeg laat de mailing list niet toe om
>     foto's toe
>     >> te voegen, dus moet je het met een link stellen
>     >>
>     >> Wat zou je kunnen mappen, of wat map je gewoonlijk als je [1] bekijkt
>     >> ? Wat zou je van nader bij gaan bekijken ?
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> p.s. Het staat je vrij om naar de andere foto's op de site [2] te
>     >> kijken en om het even wat te mappen dat je erop ziet :-) Onder de
>     foto
>     >> staat een (i), als je daarop klikt, zie je een kaartje.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> [1]
>     >>
>     
> https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-06-09-Wilrijk/i-b8Xdd5g/0/O/DSC_3228.jpg
>     >> [2] gallery:
>     >> https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-06-09-Wilrijk/i-b8Xdd5g
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Talk-be mailing list
>     >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org>
>     >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>     >>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Talk-be mailing list
>     > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org>
>     > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Talk-be mailing list
>     Talk-be@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
> 


_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to