On 08-11-16 13:30, joost schouppe wrote: > I'm a little surprised by how little space there is for explaining the > what and why of the import in this template. Things like "current use in > OSM", "quality of the data", "data model of the original data", etc > "integration methodology" etc. I would expect this to be the most > important in evaluating the import. Seems like this is all kept to the > imports talk list then? Or is this supposed to be in the explanation of > the source itself?
I just kinda anchored the page and removed some dutch text, I think it should be in English too, but I can't find GRB licensing in English atm. Feel free to blow it away actually, only the top part is mine. it's a rush job and I was planning on improving it today if only I wasn't fighting a evil tile server like a jedi master > I would like to work on that part of the page if that is useful. And we > could probably get someone from the AIV to review the technical details > too. Thanks Joost, I noticed the response on actually helping me with these is very low atm. But the "GRB pressure" to get it done seems a lot higher (not judging) But I can't do it all by myself. If I can make a suggestion, I really want the legal part in order. For technical stuff I have a lot more inspiration. Glenn _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
