As we map what is on the ground, we do not have to care about that,  I
would assume. Let someone else fight with the people that place the signs.

m

Op di 3 mrt. 2020 20:10 schreef Steven Clays <steven.cl...@gmail.com>:

> To make it more complex, not every signposted towpath in Flanders is
> legally a towpath. Check
> http://www.start2boat.be/vaaropleiding/downloads/reglementen/Bijzondere%20reglementen.pdf
>
> Op di 3 mrt. 2020 om 19:38 schreef Stijn Rombauts via Talk-be <
> talk-be@openstreetmap.org>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 'Jaagpaden' are not always paved roads. Often compacted, gravel, earthen,
>> grassy, ... roads/tracks and then highway=track seems a better choice.
>> Sometimes the only thing that's left is just a path. Then the tag
>> service=towpath is rather odd. I use description=jaagpad.
>> And what about similar roads which usually have the same access
>> restrictions but are called 'haven' or 'havengebied' instead of 'jaagpad'?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> StijnRR
>>
>>
>> Op dinsdag 3 maart 2020 16:28:46 CET schreef Pieter Vander Vennet <
>> pieterv...@posteo.net>:
>>
>>
>> Hey Marc,
>>
>> Thanks for your response.
>>
>> IMHO all towpaths are indeed peculiar service roads, thus
>> 'highway=service' + 'service=towpath'. The wiki even mentions explicitly
>> that it should be a service road.
>>
>> The examples you sent are excellent examples where the legal signposting
>> didn't catch up with the historic usage. These clearly used to be
>> towpath but they didn't gain the legal recognition of a 'jaagpad'.
>> Personally, I would tag those with 'service=towpath' (reflecting the
>> historic usage) but not with 'towpath=yes', but this is very subject to
>> change. We might even consider `towpath=no` (with a note clarifying this
>> is legally _not_ a 'jaagpad') or `legal:towpath=no` or something similar.
>>
>> Another thought: if we are about using 'towpath=yes' to reflect the
>> legal status, I'm doubting that there is no better tag scheme for this.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards, Pieter
>>
>>
>> On 03.03.20 16:12, Marc Gemis wrote:
>> > I'm fine with explicitly mapping them.
>> > Isn't service=towpath strange on a way that is not tagged as
>> > highway=service? (but you know that I think they should have been
>> > mapped as highway=service in the first place, but this is not the
>> > case)
>> >
>> > So it's meant for all those that are explicitly signed as "Jaagpad"
>> > and not for any others? So this
>> > https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/3T0U_uBJxNXHfrgwdztQDQ is not a
>> > Jaagpad? (a bit further
>> >
>> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.05439739997222&lng=4.4334043&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=cmVJ5z_VXnZqwsdrEK0aHw
>> > , but that still does not make it a Jaadpad?)
>> >
>> > m.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:14 PM Pieter Vander Vennet
>> > <pieterv...@posteo.net> wrote:
>> >> Hello everyone,
>> >>
>> >> Even though the legal restrictions of 'Jaagpaden' (towpaths in proper
>> English) is already described in detail on the wiki, it would still be
>> useful to reflect the special status explicitly, in our case to give a
>> comfort bonus in cycling route planning but also for historical purposes.
>> >>
>> >> For context, a 'jaagpad', 'trekpad' or towing path is a path that used
>> to be used to (literally) tow boats through the canals, either with
>> manpower or horsepower and a rope attached to the boat - hence there are
>> never trees between a towpath.
>> >>
>> >> With the rise of cheap and powerful combustion engines, this practice
>> became disused and towpaths became service roads and cycleways.
>> >>
>> >> As stated, these often are excellent and heavily preferred by
>> cyclists. Normally, they are wide, asphalted, there are very few cars and
>> especially: there is the very nice scenery of the canal.
>> >>
>> >> Therefore, I would propose to introduce tagging in Belgium to tag
>> towpaths.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> There are two ways to achieve this:
>> >>
>> >> - A towpath is typically a specific type of service road, so we can
>> add `service=towpath`
>> >>
>> >> - In the UK, the towpaths are tagged with `towpath=yes`
>> >>
>> >> Note that towpaths in Flanders are mostly signposted with an official
>> sign, even though that this is a bit of a legal remnant of a previous era.
>> However, it makes it very explicit and thus unambiguous to map.
>> >>
>> >> But now, for the serious questions:
>> >>
>> >> - what are your thoughts of mapping them somehow? IMHO it is an added
>> value and I'm quite in favour of them.
>> >>
>> >> - What is the best way of mapping them? I'm a bit on the edge of the
>> options above: `service=towpath` is IMHO semantically the most correct
>> form, as it indicates that it is a service road originally built for
>> towing. `towpath=yes` reeks more of the legal status (i.e. having a formal
>> road sign indicating 'jaagpad'). The latter has the advantage of already
>> being in use in the UK with over 3500 instances according to taginfo.
>> service=towpath is not in use at the moment.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> PS: fun etymological fact: the English verb 'to tow' is derived from
>> the Dutch word for rope: 'touw'
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Met vriendelijke groeten,
>> >> Pieter Vander Vennet
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Talk-be mailing list
>> >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Talk-be mailing list
>> > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>>
>> --
>> Met vriendelijke groeten,
>> Pieter Vander Vennet
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to