I've asked about this over on the tagging list as well, in case anyone wants to follow the conversation there. I've been getting mixed messages on this issue so far... at the least if the tag is kept as-is and OSRM fixed, the restriction wiki page should be changed to acknowledge the possibility of turns on relations beginning with 'no_'.
Cheers, Nate ________________________________ From: Stewart C. Russell <scr...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 11:33:53 AM To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] restriction=no_right_turn_on_red causing routing problems in Toronto On 2016-06-28 04:19 PM, Nathan Wessel wrote: > It seems like conditional restrictions may be what we need. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Conditional_restrictions > > But it looks like we would be forging new ground if we went that > direction. I don't see anything on that page about signals of any kind. > (yet!) OSRM seems to be programmatically narrow in its insistence on only scanning the 'no_' part of the restriction. These are useful and clear tags. Fix OSRM, not the map. Relations are already complex enough that many mappers avoid them. Coming from a country where the whole idea of turning on red is illegal (and all pedestrian crossings are scramble crossings, as they should be) I wonder if this is just a black swan to the developers? cheers, Stewart _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
