Do you already have a wikipage for Stats Can project? Because I think 1 wiki page per sub project would be best to no confuse the information provided. You can also create sections under your Stats Can project wiki page and link to the wiki page with more detailed information if people need more information they can consult the details.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN) < bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> wrote: > Could we make that page more encompassing of Canada and the project? Other > areas might want to get started and it would be great if they could find > the info as well. > > > > > > *From:* James [mailto:james2...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* August-03-16 12:50 PM > *To:* Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN) <bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> > *Cc:* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada > > > > We could put it here: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ottawa_Gatineau_Buildings > > and then link to it from: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:Ontario:Ottawa > > and > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gatineau > > under the data import section. That way people can find the information > much easier > > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN) < > bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> wrote: > > Great! Should we start a separate wiki page or put it under OSM Canada? > > > > *From:* James [mailto:james2...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* August-03-16 12:28 PM > *To:* Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN) <bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> > *Cc:* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org> > *Subject:* [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada > > > > We can. People at State of the map US in seattle really seemed to enjoy > how well documented it was. Which makes maintenance a bit easier if stuff > is documented > > > > On Aug 3, 2016 12:23 PM, "Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN)" < > bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> wrote: > > The city of los angeles went through the same process(importing buildings) > and this might be useful for the project: > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Los_angeles,_California/Buildings_Import > > > > On Aug 3, 2016 11:04 AM, "john whelan" <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Technically we can add to what is there but that adds volume to the > database. > > We also need to settle on the tags to be used. I noted the use of > building=retail I assume that is acceptable as well as commercial. > > Another tag used is ele which has the same values as building:levels but I > hadn't seen it before. > > Cheerio John > > > > On 3 Aug 2016 10:40 am, "Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN)" < > bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> wrote: > > We could use only a selection of tags. In the form in the interface we > will use, it could be just residential and apartments not be in the choices. > > > > We will use the tags reserved for buildings. As John mentioned, malls can > have just a few tags and then there are these shops and amenities floating > at the same address. Could we have the building and the tags shops, > offices, amenities attached to them? > > > > Bjenk > > > > *From:* James [mailto:james2...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* August-02-16 3:10 PM > *To:* john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org>; Ellefsen, Bjenk > (STATCAN) <bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> > *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada > > > > building=apartments should also be considered residential if not they are > tagged as offices. There is going to have to be grouping of some tags for > residential, commercial and industrial buildings to get a full tally > > Yeah, terrace homes, duplexes, triplexes, condos may all have unique civic > addresses. Apartments may have the the same civic address but also includes > an apartment no which needs to be mapped differently then just assigning a > address to a building(you are now getting into entraces and addr:flats) > example of a terrace home: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2688375179 > and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262705861 this is the way they are > doing it in the UK (after many hours in IRC asking how to properly map them) > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > How many buildings are tagged with a building tag or is that step one tag > building with the building tag and type? > > How do we handle a shopping mall with a building outline and a nodes for > the stores? > > Thanks John > > > > On 2 Aug 2016 2:53 pm, "James" <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is a way to tag a building type > Here is a list of the building types: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building#Values > > > > On Aug 2, 2016 2:48 PM, "Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN)" < > bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Here is what we would invite Canadians to tell us about buildings for OSM: > > > > name > > Address: > > · Number > > · street > > · city > > · postal code > > levels > > office, shop > > type of access (handicap, etc.) > > > > If there is a way to categorize them as residential, non-residential that > would be perfect. > > > > What do you think? Anything else we should add? > > > > > > Bjenk Ellefsen, PhD > > > > Data Exploration and Integration Lab (DEIL) | Lab pour l’exploration et > l’intégration de données (LEID) > > Center for Special Business Projects | Centre des Projets Spéciaux sur les > entreprises > > Statistics Canada | Statistique Canada > > (343) 998-3004 > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > > > > -- > > 外に遊びに行こう！ > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > How many buildings are tagged with a building tag or is that step one tag > building with the building tag and type? > > How do we handle a shopping mall with a building outline and a nodes for > the stores? > > Thanks John > > > > On 2 Aug 2016 2:53 pm, "James" <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is a way to tag a building type > Here is a list of the building types: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building#Values > > > > On Aug 2, 2016 2:48 PM, "Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN)" < > bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Here is what we would invite Canadians to tell us about buildings for OSM: > > > > name > > Address: > > · Number > > · street > > · city > > · postal code > > levels > > office, shop > > type of access (handicap, etc.) > > > > If there is a way to categorize them as residential, non-residential that > would be perfect. > > > > What do you think? Anything else we should add? > > > > > > Bjenk Ellefsen, PhD > > > > Data Exploration and Integration Lab (DEIL) | Lab pour l’exploration et > l’intégration de données (LEID) > > Center for Special Business Projects | Centre des Projets Spéciaux sur les > entreprises > > Statistics Canada | Statistique Canada > > (343) 998-3004 > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > > > > -- > > 外に遊びに行こう！ > > > > > -- > > 外に遊びに行こう！ > -- 外に遊びに行こう！
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
