https://i.imgur.com/CaBiPKW.png
I can see what Charles was saying about the lines....its going to be such a PITA to 1. Convert DWG to say geojson and 2. Try to make polygons out of these lines. It would almost be quicker to process the LIDAR and extract buildings from that.... That map is useful for spotting missing buildings.... On Jan 30, 2018 4:43 PM, "john whelan" <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks so I can see areas without buildings. We need to think about > importing those either from NRC data or Montreal's Open Data. I don't > think the NRC data is ready yet. > > Note to James from a technical point of view any suggestions? > > Thanks John > > On 30 January 2018 at 13:10, Pierre Choffet <p...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > >> Le 30/01/2018 à 11:23, Charles Basenga Kiyanda a écrit : >> > What we're missing is manpower. Doing an automated >> > import would be quite arduous. We're not sure where to start in order to >> > take the dwg data and automatically reconstruct closed polygons that >> > correspond to individual buildings. >> Contributeurs motivés par le dessin bâtiment par bâtiment, vous pouvez >> utiliser le fond présent sur la carte d'évaluation des données de la >> ville¹ que nous avions mis en ligne (activez la couche Bâtiments via le >> menu en haut à droite). >> >> 1 : http://carte.osmqc.ca/montreal/ >> >> Pierre >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
