On Feb 16, 2018, at 7:50 PM, Bill & Kathy Patterson
<bill_patter...@tricolour.queensu.ca> wrote:
> It would seem to me that an official place name should take precedence over
> OSM protocols. If we expand the abbreviations (or contractions), of St. and
> Ste., then are we not altering the official place name of the feature?
>
> The federal government downloaded that responsibility to the provinces, and
> in Ontario the official place names appear at
> http://www.gisapplication.lrc.gov.on.ca/Geonames/Index.html?site=Geographic_Names&viewer=Geonames&locale=en-US
Bill, as I look at "Sault Ste. Marie" in Ontario in that database and compare
it to the "Sault Ste Marie" across the water in Michigan (land of my birth, but
not in the realm of this database's naming) I note something interesting: the
Canadian version has a period, denoting an abbreviation (we do use English,
though the rule that a period is found at the end of an abbreviation in French
is the same), The Michigan one does not end in a period. Were I to edit here,
I would "follow what our OSM wiki says to put in OSM" expanding that
abbreviation ("Ste." to "Sainte" in the Ontario version). Some (many? most?)
"Sainte-Quelque Chose" names have hyphens, too. So, hm.
That would be my approach, as it is OSM's approach. This is OSM, yet it is
Canada, too, of course. It's not always easy or clear, is it?
SteveA
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
