On Jan 24, 2019, at 9:29 AM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > You seem to have made rather large changes without consultation including > changing the title of the project. You have also added some value judgments. > A number of people were involved in the original and it might have been nice > to consult with them before making such drastic changes. The word consensus > springs to mind. > > I make no comment on whether the changes are good or bad merely extensive > without apparent consultation.
John, much consensus is achieved in wiki Discussion(s), simply click the Discussion tab, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Talk:Canada_Building_Import and notice that there are four threads/sections under Discussion there already. If some "number of people" were involved in the original, they are perfectly welcome to join there. I'm not saying "don't do this in talk-ca" I am saying "there are often more-appropriate (vs. less-appropriate) places to have a discussion to achieve consensus." Sometimes, it makes sense to have an off-list email conversation in a one-on-one or one-on-many fashion. Thanks. SteveA California > On Jan 24, 2019, at 9:40 AM, OSM Volunteer stevea <stevea...@softworkers.com> > wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2019, at 9:29 AM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> You seem to have made rather large changes without consultation including >> changing the title of the project. You have also added some value >> judgments. A number of people were involved in the original and it might >> have been nice to consult with them before making such drastic changes. The >> word consensus springs to mind. >> >> I make no comment on whether the changes are good or bad merely extensive >> without apparent consultation. > > John, much consensus is achieved in wiki Discussion(s), simply click the > Discussion tab, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Talk:Canada_Building_Import and > notice that there are four threads/sections under Discussion there already. > > If some "number of people" were involved in the original, they are perfectly > welcome to join there. > > I'm not saying "don't do this in talk-ca" I am saying "there are often > more-appropriate (vs. less-appropriate) places to have a discussion to > achieve consensus." Sometimes, it makes sense to have an off-list email > conversation in a one-on-one or one-on-many fashion. Thanks. > > SteveA > California _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
