If you could share the workbench it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
On Tue., Mar. 26, 2019, 1:11 p.m. Begin Daniel, <jfd...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jarek, > There is actually no standard “code” available since I use FME ( > www.safe.com). It is a proprietary ETL application and all operations are > done using “transformers” (https://www.safe.com/transformers/). I can > provide you with the workbench I developed (a bunch of linked transformers) > but you need a license to run it. This is why I tried to describe the > operations I run on the data in the wiki. > > As you did, people may send me coordinates (bounding box) of an area they > know well. I’ll process the area and send the results back in OSM format. > Please, be reasonable on the amount of data to process ;-) > > Cheers, > Daniel > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jarek Piórkowski [mailto:ja...@piorkowski.ca] > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 12:15 > To: Begin Daniel; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 11:58, Begin Daniel <jfd...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > a first version of the cleaning tool is now functional. > > > > At this point, the tool is built to remove extra vertices, orthogonalize > building footprints (when possible) and identify overlapped geometries. > Details about the application are found in Canada Building Import > discussion page … > > > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Canada_Building_Import#Quality_Assurance_details > > > > So far, Tim has looked at the result for Montréal (Import data) and > Pierre for Toronto (OSM data). I understand from their comments that the > tool generally does its job well. However, both whish to see more > functionality added to the application (editing automation). > > > > Before going further, I would like to know if the community is at ease > with the Pierre and Tim assessment, and is ready to go further in the > import process discussion. I ask that because going further with editing > automation will definitely be more complex, without any guarantee about the > results. > > Hi Daniel, > > Thank you for your work on this. > > Are you able to share the application or code in any way? I did not > see any links in the talk page. It is really not possible to say much > without looking at what the code does with some of the buildings with > geometries I'm familiar with. > > Alternatively shall we send you over an area we're familiar with and > you could send over the results of the tool? But I am concerned that > would scale really poorly. > > To give a concrete example, I would be curious about the output of the > tool for area 43.6450,-79.4071,43.6358,-79.4289 - I know that the > geometries already in OSM for the area are partially inaccurate or > overly simplified, so I'm curious how the processed import data looks. > > Thanks again, > --Jarek > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca