I believe Toronto has been waiting a couple of years for approval from the LWG to give you some idea of time frames.
Cheerio John On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 18:05, Jarek Piórkowski <ja...@piorkowski.ca> wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > Welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions! > > To answer your first question: the non-building data sets (parks, > address points, bus stops, etc) are not currently importable without > further effort: we would have to get that exact licence (with text > including "City of Airdrie") approved by the OSM Licensing Working > Group. I don't know if the LWG would object to the attribution > requirements, possibly not, but the approval itself might take quite a > while anyway, as lawyer things don't move fast. > > --Jarek > > On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 15:42, Joshua Kenney <kenney...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello everybody! > > Relatively new mapper here. I've been working on mapping my home town, > and a couple of other places I've been, for the past 3 or 4 months. > > > > I have found that my city of Airdrie, AB has a number of datasets > available under an Open Data Licence: > > > > http://data-airdrie.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/our-open-licence > > The licence terms look straight forward enough, are there any additional > steps I need to take to confirm compatibility with OSM? > > > > One of the datasets includes building footprints. Would importing that > get in the way of the import of the national data? Where can I access the > national data to compare the quality? > > > > --Joshua > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-ca mailing list > > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
