I've been using OSRM a lot for bicycle routing in Toronto and haven't seen many route suggestions that I would consider terribly unreasonable. Sidewalks only ever appear at the start/end of a route because they may be slightly closer to the requested destination.

Nate Wessel, PhD
Planner, Cartographer, Transport Nerd
NateWessel.com <https://www.natewessel.com>

On 2020-04-03 10:51 a.m., Pierre-Léo Bourbonnais wrote:
For our researches, we use the OSRM routing engine, in which the default profile for bicycle sets the footway to walking speed (5 km/h) instead of bicycle speed (around 15-20 km/h), which is the same as dismounting for routing purpose.

On Apr 3, 2020, at 10:46, Nate Wessel <bike...@gmail.com <mailto:bike...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Which routing engines are causing problems exactly? Routing a bicycle on a sidewalk may be appropriate/reasonable in some cases and over short distances where one could be instructed to dismount and walk. I'd be interested to see some of the problematic routes that are being suggested to see if there isn't a more elegant way of resolving this.

I personally only use explicit access tags where there is clear signage indicating some type of special access restriction. Otherwise the default should be assumed. Routing engines /should/ be able to accommodate region differences in default values without needing to manually tag millions of ways. Whether they can or do allow that is a problem for the people developing the routing engines.

Nate Wessel, PhD
Planner, Cartographer, Transport Nerd
NateWessel.com <https://www.natewessel.com/>

On 2020-04-03 10:39 a.m., John Whelan wrote:
I'd recommend bicycle=no and I live in Ottawa.  In Ottawa footpaths that connect in general are bicycle=yes as they come under municipal regulation but a sidewalk on a highway comes under provincial legislation which bans bicycles on sidewalks.  Sparks street is fun I think you are not permitted to ride your bicycle but I'm unsure if this is provincial, municipal or it might even be NCC which is federal of course.

In the UK they are banned by law but in certain cities the Chief Constable has stated the law will not be enforced within the police force boundaries as a letter of interpretation.  It might be nice for Ottawa to do the same sometime but there again we have City of Ottawa police, OPP, RCMP and of course the PPS.

Cheerio John

James wrote on 2020-04-03 10:25 AM:
I don't think it's more tagging for the renderer as much as it's being more specific(more data) to specify a abstract view: without knowledge of Canadian/Provincial/Municipal laws about biking on sidewalks.

I think Montreal and Gatineau are more enforced as Ottawa it is illegal to bike on the sidewalk, but people are still doing it, but that's beside the point.

On Fri., Apr. 3, 2020, 10:18 a.m. Pierre-Léo Bourbonnais via Talk-ca, <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk-ca@openstreetmap.org>> wrote:

    Hi!

    I would like to start a discussion on how we should deal with
    sidewalks tagged separately, like it is is done in downtown
    Ottawa and like we are starting to do in the Montreal region.

    The issue is that by default highway=footway with or without
    footway=sidewalk should have an implicit bicycle=no by default
    according to this page:
    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions

    However, some osm users told me I should tag them with
    bicycle=no everywhere because routing engines use sidewalks for
    bicycle routing which is illegal in most part of Canada.

    What are your thoughts on this ? Should we adapt to routing
    engines or should routing engines fix the issue themselves?

    Thanks!


    _______________________________________________
    Talk-ca mailing list
    Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca



_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

--
Sent from Postbox <https://www.postbox-inc.com/>

_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to