I'm also of the same opinion.
El 12/04/14 19:49, Jonay Santana escribió:
I entirely agree. There's no need to give a name to a boundary, it is
just a relation between the entities involved. It would be redundant
for me.
But as always, everyone has its opinion...
El 12/04/2014 03:31, "Xuacu" <xuacu...@gmail.com
<mailto:xuacu...@gmail.com>> escribió:
Hi Sylvain, all
My best guess is that it isn't necessary to give a name to the common
border. It should be a member of two relations (España and France)
which have at least one name tag in it, so renderers will take care of
displaying such name on the correct side of the border. Adding such
"Espagne--France" tag only adds clutter and/or confuses renderers.
Just my 2¢ :)
Kind regards
--
Xuacu
2014-04-10 23:00 GMT+02:00 sly (sylvain letuffe)
<lis...@letuffe.org <mailto:lis...@letuffe.org>>:
> Holla Jonay,
>
> Le jeudi 10 avril 2014 22:32:00, Jonay Santana a écrit :
>> Hello, Sylvain. I'm not very sure about what the problem is. I
mean, what
>> are you both disagreeing at?
>
> He adds on boudary ways :
> name:es = espana -- france
> name:en = spain -- france
> name:fr = espagne -- france
> etc.
>
> While other think we should either :
> - add no name at all on boundary ways
> - or at least don't use -- as separator
>
>
>> And don't worry about your spanish, it would be great to read
you in
>> spanish besides an English version.
>
> So sorry, but it was one year, 20 years ago without practice at
all ;-(
> google translate would be by far better than me ;-)
>
> --
> sly (sylvain letuffe)
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Sletuffe
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
