Mike Harris wrote: > The lack of public right of way information is disappointing - but it > is within OSM's capabilities to walk and map it. However, the lack of > field boundary information is a serious deficiency as these are > invaluable in practice to walkers attempting to plan, navigate, record > and publish walks - especially in the more lowland and more farmed > areas. Without the OS's right to enter onto private land without any > advance permission, OSM mappers will remain seriously hampered in any > attempt to map field boundaries. Hedges may be visible in good quality > satellite or aerial photography but fences (and especially electric > fences) will be very difficult.
I agree field boundaries are valuable for walkers, but only those abutting or near PROWS are relevant & these are obviously obtainable by walking there. Spring is in the air, put your boots on a go walking! Cheers Dave F. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
