If I collect a GPS trace of a road that is tagged as say 'source=NPE', I will adjust the road to match the trace, and change it to source=survey. That means that unless you look through the history there will be no evidence that it was once derived from another source...but, once you have surveyed it, I don't think it is derived from the other source any more, so this is fair enough?
Graham. On 23 July 2010 14:42, Chris Fleming <m...@chrisfleming.org> wrote: > On 22/07/10 16:25, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > >> Ed Avis wrote: >> >> >>> As an aside, I think the 'source' tag is a bit misconceived; it would >>> make >>> much more sense to tag source on the changeset, not on each object it >>> touches. >>> >>> >> Only if you solely use one source per changeset. I'll typically use at >> least >> a mix of NPE, OS OpenData, GPS survey and personal knowledge, and >> sometimes >> more. >> >> > I tend to do the same - although if I have a track for a road that was > previously source = "not survey" I will generally modify it to match the > tracks and either delete the source tag or edit it to be source=survey > > Although I don't think I'm consistent. What do people tend to do? > > > One I did recently is > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4981553/history and shows the > evolution of what is initially a traced name = FIXME into a fully surveyed > way by 4 people over nearly 3 years :) > > Although this is a good case of where an area appears done and so I didn't > visit it, until the the OS comparsion stuff came out. At which point I've > discovered lots of missing stuff. > > Cheers > Chris > > > > > > -- > e: m...@chrisfleming.org > w: www.chrisfleming.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > -- Dr. Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK email: grahamjones...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb