On 03/01/2006 00:37, Dave F. wrote:
On 07/08/2010 19:34, Richard Moss wrote:
I take data from OS as evidence that there is a name for a road/track etc.
I'm happy with that where I know a road exists, and I have added names
to the farm tracks around the village. But putting roads on OSM
without actually verifying that they exists, that's another debate :)
Personally I'd take OS as evidence of the existence of a road as well.
Obviously it would be good to have travelled it as OSL isn't the most
accurate for location & direction, but at least we know it's there.
It was concluded in a previous discussion that OS didn't put 'easter
eggs' into their data.
Do you have any examples of roads not being on the ground?
A 'road' of some sort yes. But the OS Streetview maps sometimes aren't
clear whether its an unclassified road, a residential road, a driveway
or farm track or a path etc. Plus a few roads which are still under
construction.
Anyway, isn't this thread is about names from OS Locator, not names from
OS Streetview.
PS: your clock is rather wrong.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
