Sorry Richard for spamming you - one day I'll remember this replies to the person rather than the group by default - argh!
On 20 June 2012 15:11, Richard Mann <richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com> wrote: > The people who collected the data tell me that the cycle lane widths were > recorded in 3 categories: > 1) <1.5m > 2) 1.5>=x>2 > 3) >=2 > > So the values in the data (1.25 and 1.75 mostly) are spuriously accurate > and quite often overstated. > > Ah Ha, that explains why many of the 1.25m ones seam very generous - more like 0.6m on the ground (with a wall to one side and water to the other) for about half a dozen of them! *On 20 June 2012 15:21, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) <gra...@dalmuti.net> wrote: * *For the "link routes" as they are known within Sustrans, they should indeed have brackets around the ref on the signpost. They can go into OSM as route relations in themselves, e.g.* I've a few LCN's called (6) to change to NCN's then!
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
