On Tuesday 19 June 2012, Andy Allan wrote: > On 19 June 2012 09:41, Robert Scott <li...@humanleg.org.uk> wrote: > > > Or even could we just have the changesets tagged that they're being made by > > the cnxc potlatch rather than vanilla potlatch? > > It's just a "vanilla" potlatch instance, by the way. All the merging > panels etc are built-in to the standard potlatch, there's no special > code or branch or anything in the deployment that we're using here. > > It's the extra layer definitions in vectors.xml that trigger the > merging functionality. You can take any installation of p2 and add > your own layers in the vectors.xml file, and I'd encourage people to > run custom deployments of p2 whenever and where-ever is appropriate!
Then I wonder if it would be totally insane to make (vanilla) potlatch add some sort of "potlatch instance base url" tag to changesets. robert. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
