On 24/03/2013 11:38, Nick Whitelegg wrote:

1. Didn't appear on Freemap when I updated the data earlier today (first update since the 64-bit ID issue in Feb)

Well, to be honest, there's your problem. Freemap, to me, is a bit of a joke.


2. Went onto Potlatch and the natural=water polygon seemed to be missing in both cases.

No, they're in the multipolygon. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon

Dave F.



Other lakes in the Lake District all ok.


-----"Dave F." <dave...@madasafish.com> wrote: -----
From: "Dave F." <dave...@madasafish.com>
Date: 24/03/2013 11:11AM
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Windermere and Rydal Water - missing

What do you think is wrong with them?

They're visible in mapnik, & most ways haven't been edited since
January. There does appear to be a bit of pointless overuse of
multipolygons to represent riverbanks, but nothing that makes them
'missing'.

Dave F.



_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to