On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, at 05:59 PM, John Aldridge wrote: > On 15/01/2014 17:49, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > > On 15 January 2014 16:03, John Aldridge <j...@jjdash.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >> If I believed there was a snowflake in hell's chance of getting > >> amenity=post_depot objects displayed on the default map, I'd be more > >> sympathetic, but as it is I think I'd prefer something like... > > > > If everyone followed that reasoning, there would never be any new tags > > created! Besides, deliberately tagging known-not-to-be-a-post-office > > objects as post offices is incorrectly tagging for the renderer. > > I do understand your position, but I don't think that's a fair criticism > of mine. These things *are* post offices by the definition in the Wiki, > so I don't think it's unreasonable to tag them that way.
Then maybe the definition in the Wiki should be modified to correspond to what most people will intuitively see as a post office? I would say that a post office is not only a place where you can send *or* collect letters and parcels, but rather a place where you can send letters and parcels (including buying stamps and weighting your parcels), *and possibly* collect letters and parcels. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
