(I should clarify that by "compatible" I meant forward-compatible rather than interoperable. OGL data is suitable as an input to a OdBL dataset, but not vice versa.)
-- Owen (@owenboswarva) On 18 February 2015 at 18:04, Jo Walsh <metaz...@fastmail.net> wrote: I asked @owenboswarva on Twitter who is an active voice whom i trust on > open government data issues, and he said this: > > "IMO the only significant difference is v3 explicitly permits re-users to > list multiple attributions via a URI or link. > ...the differences are mostly just tidier syntax. If you are happy v2 is > compatible with OdBL (IMO it is) then v3 is also." > > > zx > -- > Jo Walsh > metaz...@fastmail.net > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015, at 12:04 AM, Rob Nickerson wrote: > > On 17 February 2015 at 23:57, Matthijs Melissen <i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> > wrote: > > > I could imagine that OGL-3 has imported OS ODL's clause on > sublicensing that caused incompatibility with ODbL, which would make > OGL-3 incompatible with ODbL.Do we have confirmation that this is not > the case, i.e. that OGL-3 and ODbL are compatible? > > -- Matthijs > > > > All the OGL versions are online. A comparison of v2 and v3 shows nothing > to worry me. Hopefully Robert W will chip in as he's clued up on all this. > > Version 3: > http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ > > Version 2: > http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/2/ > *_______________________________________________* > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
