Well, it's going to be a struggle to get a good result while the default rendering puts layer=-1 platforms on top of layer=0 footways. Has anyone raised a ticket for that?
Richard On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:13 PM, SK53 <sk53....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Seems a very sensible request. It may be worth posting this to the forums. > Marek who is very active in both 3D buildings & indoor mapping tends to be > there and not on mailing lists. There are both 3D building & indoor mapping > subfora too, > > Jerry > > On 20 September 2015 at 19:54, Brian Prangle <bpran...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone >> >> I've blogged <http://www.mappa-mercia.org/blog> about this and the >> complexities involved with this multi-level and multi-purpose building. It >> would be good if we can plan how to map this sensibly and co-ordinate >> effort in an agreed way and not just have a free-for-all accretion of POIs >> and ways which will end up as an indecipherable tangle (it's pretty bad >> already). >> >> Grand Central, the shopping mall on top of New Street station opens this >> week on 24 September >> >> Assistance welcomed from railway, public transport and 3D mappers. If >> there's any enthusiasm for helping local mappers I'll start a wiki project >> page where we can record agreed protocols. >> >> Regards >> >> Brian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
