One strategy is to try & map shops at one level as areas; and map shops in remaining areas as nodes; the nodes can be slightly offset so that all are visible. It's a bit of a kludge, but providing the tagging is sensible about using layer & building:level etc, it's not tagging for the renderer, merely choosing a particular convention for mapping.
Jerry On 24 September 2015 at 16:52, Derick Rethans <o...@derickrethans.nl> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Richard Mann wrote: > > > Had a look round. The main upper-level (ie Grand Central) footways are > > mercifully fairly simple, but of course the proliferation of shops on > > multiple levels is going to be very hard to display. > > > > My suggestion would be to focus conventional tagging on the main street / > > concourse level, with a minimalist approach to the other layers/levels. > I'm > > thinking maybe do the layer 1 footways as highway=footway+bridge=yes, and > > the layer 1 shops as level1:shop=xxx+level1:name=yyy. > > I've previously just done for shops, layer=1;shop=whatever;name=foo and > draw (where possible) the different shop outlines: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.54312/-0.00574 And for the > footways and pedestrian areas, just footway=yes;layer=1 > > It doesn't render well, but the data is there. > > cheers, > Derick > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
