Hi
This situation occurs nationally; it's just been highlighted around
Nottingham.
I created an admin 10 relation for the city of Bath, but had it pointed
to me that it didn't have a direct council & so the boundary was changed
to 'place'
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5342409
I can probably predict the response, but it might be worth personally
inviting user Alex Kemp to the meeting.
Dave F.
On 21/08/2016 09:59, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/08/2016 13:33, Colin Smale wrote:
In the East Midlands Alex Kemp has been adding relations for these
unparished areas, only distinguishable from Civil Parish relations by
means of the value of the "designation" tag. This is contrary to our
normal practice and feels counter-intuitive - why add an object to
OSM which by definition does not exist?
It's pretty clear here that there's a concensus behind _not_ mapping
these "holes" as admin_level=10 (EdLoach's "boundary=unparished_area"
would make sense to me), but presumably we can wait until after
Tuesday (when the next East Midlands pub meet is, and all local
participants in the discussion will have an opportunity to be there).
Best Regards,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
