On 2016-10-19 15:55, Dave F wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was the thread's originator.
>
> I haven't rechecked all their changesets, but from memory they didn't add any
> restrictions, just split roads, apparently at random points. Thanks for the
> reminder that I need to go a reconnect them.
>
> Did they ever come back with a satisfactory explanation for their source?
Don't think so but I haven't scanned all the changesets and their
comments... IIRC one was just/mainly splitting roads at strategic points
(bridges, speed limit changes etc) in preparation for tagging changes,
and the other was actually adding maxheight/maxwidth etc.
I don't think we ever got to a consensus about how to tag
"maxwidth/maxweight except for access" (anything with "destination" is
not sufficient here) and "unsuitable for HGVs". I am sure any serious
HGV router will want to know about this... We are going to have to crack
this nut - preferably before loads of people invent their own way of
tagging these pseudo-restrictions, or, possibly worse still, ignore them
so they are not captured at all.
//colin
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
