I have always held the view that the great strength of OSM is boots on the ground and mapping what we see is always better than other sources.
I currently have a dispute with a remote mapper who is upgrading tertiary roads to primary. In the case of one I see a quiet tertiary road, with no signs indicating other than the local area it serves. It is narrow, has narrow pavements and has lots of parked cars. There is slightly longer bypass route, which was until this change routing on the bypass roads. Now OSM is routing through a residential area. I cannot dispute this is legally a primary, OS Opendata shows it. I can certainly change the ref to unsigned:ref and ensure any weight restrictions are mapped but is the view of others? Phil (trigpoint) _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
