On 19/07/2019 13:37, Tom Hughes wrote:
I would say the logical consequence of that argument is that no road
should be mapped as tertiary, as, unless taken from OS, it is a
subjective judgement and can't be consistently verified.
That doesn't follow - in the UK we have always (with very rare
exceptions like Oxford High Street) mapped secondary, primary and
trunk to the official status of the road.
You seem to be rejecting the original proposal. I was analysing the
case where the original proposal is accepted, and therefore the official
status must be ignored if it is not signposted.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
