Thank you Andy, have commented, waiting to see if they respond. Phil (trigpoint)
On Sunday, 5 January 2020, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 05/01/2020 21:33, Philip Barnes wrote: > > I have just come across an armchair edit using Facebook AI data. > > > > They do seem to have failed to check that detections are accurate, or > > lack experience to identify common Midlands farmland features. They > > have mapped several hedges as tracks. > > > > > The usual suggestions apply, I think - politely explain via a changeset > discussion comment what the problems are (e.g. that there are false > positives and false negatives, and issues with offsets). If that > resolves things, great - if not raise it with the DWG. > > I'm not convinced that false positives per se are a problem provided > that iD guides them through the process of agreeing that "yes, that > really does look like a sensible feature based on the context". If that > isn't happening (and that's certainly a problem to some extent elsewhere > in iD with "automatic brand tagging", and with some Maproulette tasks > that appear to be just "community-washing" mechanical edits) then again, > raise it with the DWG. > > Best Regards, > > Andy > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > -- Sent from my Sailfish device _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
