It would seem to be "rather" unlikely that such reference ids would be named UPRN and UPSN outside of the UK to start with, so a more generic building_ref, street_ref or similar would be likely more sensible (if there is any value at all in mapping these). And yes similar concepts exist outside of the UK too, however I do not know any case of them finding wide spread use in lieu of addresses any where.
Simon Am 09.04.2020 um 16:08 schrieb Gareth L: > Can’t the key location be inferred by the fact it is within a country bounds > rather than redundantly added? > > Gareth > >> On 9 Apr 2020, at 14:46, Tony OSM <tonyo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> That makes perfect sense to me. >> >> Any other views? >> >> Tony >> >>> On 09/04/2020 14:31, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: >>>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 14:26, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) >>>> <robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 09:21, Tony OSM <tonyo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> If the data is to be in the public domain the next step has to be tagging. >>>>> Do we need country specific tags for these two pieces of data? >>>>> What should they be? >>> [snip] >>>> So I'd propose that we use either ref:uprn and ref:usrn, or >>>> ref:UK:uprn and ref:UK:usrn. What does everyone else think? >>> Oops. If we were to use the ISO Alpha-2 country codes, it should of >>> course be GB rather then UK. So that would make the keys ref:GB:uprn >>> and ref:GB:usrn . >>> >>> Robert. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
