Hi Rodrigo

Before you create a vote on the wiki, can I suggest a different
method? "OSM UK" has started using Loomio for discussions and votes,
and it generally seems to work out well. I think Loomio is designed
for the purpose of making good decisions together:
https://www.loomio.org/openstreetmap-uk/

I'm sorry, I don't wish to confuse you with tools and differing opinions...

Cheers
Dan

Op ma 28 sep. 2020 om 15:31 schreef Rodrigo Díez Villamuera
<rodr...@rodrigodiez.io>:
>
> Thanks all of you for your messages.
>
> As a new joiner, I could not ask for more than other members engaging in such 
> a passionate way :)
>
> It's fair to say that there is no clear consensus of whether the proposal, in 
> its current form, is acceptable or not. So, I am going to create a voting 
> section on the wiki page to help us visualise what people think
>
> However, before I do that I would like to reply to a point that was made by 
> Andy
>
> Andy,
>
> I'm not actually convinced that's a problem - as others have said, web 
> browsers are perfectly capable of converting "www.mypub.com" into either 
> "https://www.mypub.com"or ""http://www.mypub.com"as appropriate, so this 
> doesn't really add any value.  "Letting the browser sort it out" is a great 
> approach as it can deal with now/near future things such as removal TLS 1.0 
> and 1.1 support as well.
>
> This is not true based on my experience. I just tested on the latest version 
> of Chrome and Firefox and, if the URL scheme is not specified, they both open 
> the the URL using http even if https is also available for it.
>
> You may have experienced a behaviour by which the user gets redirected from 
> the http url to the https one but that depends on the configuration of the 
> site server which is not always set-up.
>
> This is also well documented for Firefox here: 
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/URL_Bar_Algorithm
>
> I see value in updating schemaless :website tags with the https version if 
> available.
> --
> Rodrigo Díez Villamuera
>
> w: http://rodrigodiez.io
> t: @rodrigodiez_pro
> p: 00 44 7513 638225
>
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 13:50, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 10:00, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote:
>>
>> > The change you plan to execute is of limited use. Yes, it ensures more
>> > conformity in the data, but it will be a temporary fix (since new
>> > "wrong" URLs can be added at any time).
>>
>> This seems like an argument for never fixing any error.
>>
>> > So what your edit does is, it "touches" lots of objects and adds no
>> > meaningful information whatsoever.
>>
>> This statement is false, not least because in some cases "http://"; is
>> added, in others "https://";; each of those - and the difference
>> between them - conveys meaningful information.
>>
>> > It creates load on the database
>>
>> The level of load is trivial. Have our database maintainers ever said
>> that a load of such small magnitude is problematic?
>>
>> > There are many, many better ways to contribute to OSM than runnning a
>> > useless automated conformity edit. Take a notebook or mobile editor, go
>> > outside, check if the phone booths on OSM are still there on the ground,
>> > add a few opening times, or even trees for that matter - a single hour
>> > of such original work is more useful to OSM that what you are proposing
>> > here.
>>
>> Denigrating another's contribution - a valid and valuable contribution
>> - in this manner is antithetical to the spirit in which OSM activity
>> is supposed to be conducted.
>>
>> > Remember: OSM is not an IT project.
>>
>> Of course it is. "Information technology (IT) is the use of computers
>> to store, retrieve, transmit, and manipulate data or information." [1]
>>
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_technology
>>
>> --
>> Andy Mabbett
>> @pigsonthewing
>> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to