Shekhar, Thanks for your efforts and thoughts on this. I think we'll be fine with a VM for now. Also, I am open to some financial contributions for this specific purpose, if needed. Regards, Ishan
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Shekhar Krishnan <shek...@topomancy.com> wrote: > This then goes back to the hosting question. Our original offer was > co-hosting on the server which also hosts OHM (and ChaloBEST). This is > apparently undesirable to the community. > > We could provide a dedicated box, but that was not my intent in restarting > this thread, which goes back years. My aim was to remove the obstacle if > hosting and storage are issues. > > Also hosting at HBCSE/TIFR (where I work and where Johnson made a start on > this) is not reliable, as sys-admins there are few and overburdened, and > servi es are unreliable. > > At this point only a small number of active OSM India enthusiasts would be > using this service. Can we use a VM for now? If we're asking for a > dedicated box I'll have to approach Tim and Schuyler in Topomancy to see if > they agree. > > Can't Mapbox India underwrite this small expense for the India community? > Mikel, any thoughts? > > S.K. > On Jan 27, 2015 8:33 PM, "Sanjay Bhangar" <sanjaybhan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey hey, >> >> Many apologies for the confusion there, then - I think I was half >> remembering conversations from some time ago where that was the plan. >> If the plan is just to mirror the OSM data and provide alternate >> styles more appropriate for India and localized, let's rock on :) >> >> I guess we still need a server for this, though, as people have >> rightly pointed out, its probably not a good idea to co-host with OHM. >> >> Thanks - and sorry again for the confusion :) - great to know that the >> boundary issue can also be managed with styles alone, that sounds >> great. >> >> Cheers, >> Sanjay >> >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:27 PM, H.S.Rai <hardeep....@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Arun Ganesh <arun.plane...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> The boundaries remain a big reason to have our own tiles. All this >> takes is >> >> changes to the stylesheet, not the data itself. >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > I am unable to get message which caused this confusion. >> > >> > We intend to have only tile server. >> > >> > -- >> > H.S.Rai >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Talk-in mailing list >> > Talk-in@openstreetmap.org >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-in mailing list >> Talk-in@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-in mailing list > Talk-in@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-in mailing list Talk-in@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
