Hi Martin, I answer here under your comments:

Il 30/01/2014 13:42, Martin Raifer ha scritto:
Hello,

since you are going to discuss the address import tomorrow at the OpenGisData.eu mappers meeting, and I can't be there in person, I'll give you some comments here:

1. "Less is more"

* addr:full tags

I'd just drop the addr:full:* tags, they are of no use here.
I don't understand: need to drop only addr:full:it and the addr:full:de and taking the addr:full or need to drop addr:full too?

* addr:country tags

Drop the addr:country tags, too. This is overly redundant in my opinion. The only place where this data may come in handy would be for addresses that are very near to the border, but in those cases the addr:country could be added by the mapper during the import, if one thinks that it makes sense.
OK i will drop it.

* addr:source tags

Drop those. It's good enough to tag the source on the changesets (and the import wiki pages). No need for a source tag on every imported datum.
OK i will drop it

2. Address tagging

I think we've talked about this already [1], but addresses in South Tyrol are of two different kinds: a) street-based or b) place-based.
The kinds are 3: a) street-based,  b) place-based  c) both

If it is street-based, the addr:street tag must be used (and if available, an addr:hamlet can be used optionally to indicate the "Fraktion/frazione" of the address). On the other hand, if an address is place-based the addr:place tag must be used and there must be no addr:street tag.
Surely!

Looking at the test data for Martell, I see that all addresses are converted as street-based ones, which is incorrect as most (or all?) of them are actually place-based addresses. (See how the addresses in Martell are currently tagged.)
I pay many attenction about this question: In the Wege DB there are no place-based addresses in Martell. This is not an error. All the actually place-based addresses are incorrect. I say this because in the other municipality (for example Bressanone) the place-based addresses are correct.
But i'm going to check this problem within tomorrow

I know that the WEGE-DB doesn't directly have this data (and that the data is quite inconsistent from one municipality to the next). But that doesn't mean that you can import this incomplete data into OSM. The solution to this problem is either to program some kind of heuristic that takes nearby places into account, or to let mappers decide before or during the import (this approach would require a more elaborate importing procedure rather than just providing 3 .osm files to import with JOSM).

3. "addr:aa2osmid"

I think we've talked about this, too. Why do you need other ids to represent already unique identifiers? While having external IDs (like GTFS stuff, TMC, Gemeindekennzahl, etc.) in OSM is quite bad in principle, this particular ID is even worse: There is no accessible external dataset to which these IDs correspond to, nobody other than you can check if they are still correct, no mapper can know what to put in if new addresses are mapped on the ground or if errors are being corrected, etc… Also, see point number 1 above (less is more).

I don't see how this field should be necessary in the future. Please show me one use-case where this ID is necessary. Until then I'm strongly against importing this field.
I need to update the wikipage, i will to publish the external dataset, but if you say that this ID is not necessary, i will drop it.

4. Announce internationally

Please note that you will have to announce this import also on the international @imports [2] mailing list. In the last few months there have been several other address import proposals which were all heavily discussed.
Ok. also i am going to do this next week.

Best regards,
Martin
Thank you very much,
Pietro

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AltoAdige_-_Südtirol/OpenGisData_HouseNumber_Import2#OSM_tags
[2] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports


_______________________________________________
Talk-it-southtyrol mailing list
Talk-it-southtyrol@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-southtyrol

Reply via email to