The project is really interesting: I often needed to find places for refill as a cyclist and RV user. But still, since project aims to have a comprehensive map of drinking/refilling places, I wonder why a photo approach has been chosen. Maybe a point-click-upload is more sexy than a boring survey app? Or prospect to see your image online can trigger a sort of gamification? Or both?
Of course photos (mapillary, openstreetcam, commons or whatever) are not an issue, but I don't think they will add more value to simple OSM nodes with approprieate tags (BTW bottle=yes|no is important). Il dom 19 gen 2020, 21:37 European Water Project < europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi Giovanni, > > Our main goal is to get as many refill points for water bottles as > possible on the map, either fountains or participating café and bars. > > And then to get people to use them and stop buying plastic. > > I am not sure why adding photos of fountains to Wikimedia commons which > shows the fountain in its spacial context is an issue. > > Would you prefer the photos be linked to wikidata items and then have the > wikidata item number added to the OSM node? > > Best regards, > > Stuart > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020, 20:52 Cascafico Giovanni <cascaf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello Stuart, >> >> I think collecting hundreds of (similar) photos is not useful for what >> the project aims to. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-it mailing list >> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-it mailing list > Talk-it@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it >
_______________________________________________ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
