Grabteam, Please see my comments below for clarification.
Michael Sent from my iPhone > On 20 Feb 2019, at 15:55, Erwin Olario <gov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Currently, many highways within gated subdivisions are tagged as private. It > seems that the more appropriate tag is access=destination, where access > rights are granted every time a guest is allowed in, and is the most likely > case. access=permissive is not necessarily correct, where the visitor is > assumed to have been given casual access, without asking further permission. > > In summary, common access values for access for local roads: > private - access to owners only (e.g, household driveways) > destination - temporary access is given, until destination is reached (shared > roads, in gated communities/subdivisions/estates) > permissive - nominally private, casual use are tolerated by the owners until > revoked (e.g. private subdivisions, without guards or barriers) > > > >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 3:35 PM grab osm via talk-ph >> <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org> wrote: >> Hi Team, >> >> Request your help in clarifying a couple of questions related to access >> restrictions. >> >> 1)**Incorrect segments assigned as access=private** >> At this location, 14.6792514, 121.0568702, there is a gate with name(Gate to >> Pingki-an 2). This is a gate to a footpath. In years past there was access here but the neighbouring subdivision has since closed the gate. I have updated the permission to “private.” I have also adjusted the gates position to make it clearer that it affects the footpath and not the residential street. >> Basis gate location and name, we assume segments to the north should be >> assigned as access=permissive basis poi's and surrounding landuse polygon >> names >> Example way id's - >> way 655215117 Changed to “destination” >> way 655215119 Changed to “destination” >> way 655215118 Changed to “destination” >> way 129591536 This is a footpath or eskinita. Access is from the north via a network of other footpaths or eskinita. >> However, access restrictions are given to segments towards south >> Example way id's - >> way 28296648 Changed to “destination” >> way 23172246 Changed to “destination” >> way 23172447 Changed to “destination” >> >> 2)**Segments assigned as access=private should be changed to >> access=permissive** >> Below mentioned example way id's are assigned as access=private, however >> basis the landuse residential polygons, we assume access should be changed >> to permissive. >> Example way id's - >> way 130960943 Changed to “destination” >> way 22952874 Changed to “destination” >> way 28296647 Changed to “destination” >> way 22952900 Changed to “destination” >> >> Alternatively we have created an issue in our github page. >> Kindly take time to review and suggest. >> >> Thanks, >> GrabTeam >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk-ph mailing list >> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph > -- > /Erwin Olario > > e: er...@ngnuity.xyz | v/m: https://t.me/GOwin | s: https://mstdn.io/@GOwin > > _______________________________________________ > talk-ph mailing list > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
_______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
