Michał Borsuk <michal.borsuk <at> gmail.com> writes: > This were true if we had 30 editors, but we have three. We have to bend > over to those who maintain them.
I do value the time and efforts editors' authors invested, and I believe everyone does. > Part of the mess is exactly the lack of a sensible and well documented > (wiki page!) standard. My aim is to allow semi-beginners to be able to > map at least the simplest things. I agree. Will currently discussed proposal be approved or disapproved, wiki should be cleaned up. Obvoiusly, before cleanup the preferred tagging way should be defined. > This may be surprising, but in many areas the map is pretty full. In my > area almost everything is mapped. If somebody likes editing OSM, they > might just as well turn to mapping bus lines, with some help from us. Happy you. I agree that the proposed scheme isn't very easy to map without designated tools; nor established scheme is. Additionally, there's no single established scheme, but lots of variations (in one km distance around me I see bus_stops on the way, bus_stops beside the way, single bus stop on the way put between two actual stops in forward and backward directions, highway=platform points beside the way combined with bus_stops on the way and, finally, `site' relations). If you have another proposal, please come up. I personally do not have any sentimental feelings for the proposed scheme, I just believe it's better than the current situation. _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
