what is the benefit in doing this? have done it earlier but it is a lot of work and I can't find any reason in which use ore application it helps. If you consider it a sign of completeness or accuracy then this is not the way to go. If you want to see if anyone worked on tiger data it is as simple as creating a diff between the original tiger uploads and the current planet. most of the tiger tags should be erased from the database. After split,merge,duplicate,move,correct of ways these tags totally broken. A bot could be used to erase them on any node,way which was modified from the original data.
On 22 Apr 2009, at 7:14 , Russ Nelson wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Paul Fox wrote: > > Hey there, Paul, I'm glad to see you working on OSM. >> >> given how many roads will need reviewing, what's the absolute >> most efficient way to do so? > > In JOSM, select all the roads. You can do this using several methods: > o Search for certain tags. For example, if you've downloaded a > small section, and you've reviewed every street name and location, you > can search for "tiger:reviewed" to catch all the unreviewed ways. > o Draw a box around the ways. > o Shift-click on way after way after way (Control-click if you > select too much). > > When you've selected everything you want to mark as reviewed, go to > the Properties box on the right. Scroll down to tiger:reviewed. > Click on it, and then click on the trash can on the right. Poof! > > -- > Russ Nelson - http://community.cloudmade.com/blog - > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:RussNelson > r...@cloudmade.com - Twitter: Russ_OSM - > http://openstreetmap.org/user/RussNelson > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
