At 2009-08-06 15:53, Alan Mintz wrote: >At 2009-08-06 15:34, Frederik Ramm wrote: > >Responding to Alan: > > > I actually would prefer that the tiger:* tags were removed from those > > > nodes, since they are indeed not useful, though I suppose I could just do > > > this myself fairly simply. > > > >910 nodes is something we can always to as a one-off later on. For the > >automatic run, I would like to have it as simple as possible in order to > >minimize possible errors. So if you don't object I'd just say we go with > >the "only work on nodes where source is unset or "tiger_import_dch..." rule. > >I should also point out that, in the area I am editing (circa 34.1,-117.5), >I corrected all the source=tiger_import_dch... tags to >tiger:source=tiger_import_dch... after consulting with Dave Hansen (the >misnaming was a minor bug in the import script). Others may have done this >as well, so you should also delete tiger:source tags if you find them on >those nodes.
I forgot that, in addition, you should also include those nodes where tiger:source=tiger_import_dch... (i.e. the ones that were corrected from source=tiger_import_dch...). -- Alan Mintz <alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net> _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
