On 4/19/10 1:45 PM, Mike N. wrote: > > From an old message: > > >> I take the point that 'road realignment' may >> require the boundary also to move, but the word is MAY and so what ever >> happens >> to the road, the location of the boundary needs to be checked separately! >> It is >> quite surprising in the UK how many roads are being moved, but that does >> not >> also move the original boundary. >> > I see that the separate VS tangled argument has been settled in the US by > the "Duplicate Node attack bots", who have blindly merged all duplicate > nodes. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38855677 > i don't know if settled is the word for it, the debate is still open, but currently the josm validator reports duplicate nodes as errors, and provides a "fix" button that merges them. it's not fully automated like a bot, but the result is effectively the same.
richard _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
