On 01/03/2011 09:52 AM, Alan Mintz wrote: > At 2011-01-02 19:46, Paul Johnson wrote: >> On 01/01/2011 11:55 AM, Richard Weait wrote: >> > I've been adding more highway shields to the shield renderer. Most >> > recently I've added a shield for Historic Route 66. >> > >> > >> http://weait.com:8080/map/shield.html?lat=40.36679&lon=-89.10653&zoom=16&layers=BTF >> > > Cool. Shouldn't the relation be tagged: > > network=US:US > ref=66 > modifier=HISTORIC
Technically, probably shouldn't exist, since US-66 hasn't existed since sometime in the late 1980s and it's using the recreational brown signs today. Given the number of times US-66's route has changed, I'm not sure it even makes sense to use relations for this without qualifying the era. > according to > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging ? > > Also, is it now "correct" to not tag (network, ref) the individual way > that are part of a route relation? What about name? Is it "correct" to > remove those existing tags from the ways (and ensure they are on the > relation)? I'm not talking about a large-scale bot update, but "as long > as I'm editing them for some other reason anyway". > > >> Eh, OK-66 and Old US-66 and USBR-66 are all in my neighborhood. > > What is USBR-66? US Bike Route. I'm thinking Oklahoma jumped the gun on posting it as such since as far as I can tell, only 1 and 76 exist so far in that network (and Oklahoma's not even using the right signs for that).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us