On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/13/2012 6:21 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've never been to Fresno, but I can't believe there would not be a >> single primary road there. Still, that is the Truth According To >> OSM[1] >> >> Who knows more about this situation? Are there any local mappers on >> this list who can shed their light on this? Is this armchair mapping >> gone awry? Someone who doesn't like red? > > > It could just as easily be local mapping gone awry, by a local who thinks > only state highways should be primary. The TIGER import would not have > included any primaries, since there are no U.S. Highways in Fresno (though > any such would be motorway).
So only TIGER CFCC A2* were mapped to highway=primary in the import? I guess that makes sense -- TIGER has a clear distinction between primary (A2), secondary (A3) and local roads (A4). But in that classification, where do the tertiary and trunk roads come in? I can't find the original TIGER files that the import was sourced from, but would that show that there are no A2 class roads in Fresno? -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2 salt lake city, ut 84103 801-550-5815 http://oegeo.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us