Just saw some of this going in and decided to take a look. Specifically this node: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2078174875
- I think there is pretty good consensus that we don't need addr:state and addr:country tags - The addr:street tag has odd capitalization - The building=* tag typically doesn't belong on nodes - It has both building and landuse tags. Seems odd. - There doesn't appear to be a building there on Bing. Is it new? - Not sure about all the lbcs: tags. Sometimes it is useful to pull in external information but it is also clutter in OSM - The tags are all identical to this node that is 60 meters north: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2078081231 Seems like this could use some more fixing up before it hits the OSM database. Toby On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Mike Dupont <jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I have added the info to the wiki > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kansas/Shawnee_County/Import > > also the scripts are updated. I am been manually replacing the plot info > with just the building, so the only info being imported are the house > numbers and zip codes and the lbcs tags. Also for the new script, I create a > single point with the average location of the points making up the plot and > then manually place that on top of the major building manually. this checks > the data and also basically removes all data being copied, everything is > only just the basic facts. > > mike > > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Mike Dupont > <jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Martin Koppenhöfer >> <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 15/dic/2012 um 22:39 schrieb Mike Dupont >>> <jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com>: >>> >>>> 3. What tagging are you proposing? >>> >>> addr:* and landuse >>> the only additional tag are the four detailed landuse tags >>> eg >>> lbcs:activity:code {1100=1} >>> lbcs:activity:name {Household activities=1} >>> lbcs:function:code {1170=1} >>> lbcs:function:name {Garden apartment complex (1=1} >>> >>> These codes are details on how the lot is zoned. otherwise I am using >>> this information for fixing the street names and zip codes. >>> >>> Are the landuses you plan to tag actual landuses or permitted/planned >>> landuses? >> >> >> These are actual landuses, the ones that describe the business. >> when you register a business here in kansas, you have to provide this >> information. >> https://www.kansas.gov/bess/flow/main?execution=e1s1 >> >> I will also be looking into how that data can be extracted and compared >> some day. This is more than zoning infomation. >> If you look at this for example : >> http://www.snco.us/Ap/C_prop/Listing.asp?PRCL_ID=0973604030001000 >> >> "2151-Grocery store / supermarket" >> "2110-Goods-oriented shopping" >> that is very accurate and could be used for direct tag information. >> >> there is a building layer on the snco gis site, but I have not figured out >> how to extract it, it seems to be hidden. So I am tracing them from bing. >> http://gis.snco.us/ArcGIS/rest/services/Basemap_102100/MapServer/7 >> http://gis.snco.us/ArcGIS/rest/services/Basemap_102100/MapServer/8 >> >>>> 4. The last few times someone has proposed importing property lot >>>> data the consensus has been that that type of data shouldn’t be imported >>>> into OSM. Why is this different? >>> >>> I am importing the plots for zipcode, house number and address data. It >>> is being used to tag the buildings, it can be deleted when it has been >>> totally processed. >>> >>> >>> >>> IMHO addresses belong (often) to plots, so in these cases there is no >>> point in transferring the address information to a building. Don't remember >>> consensus to not import property limits. I do remember though that there >>> were concerns about the sheer amount of data increase if we imported this >>> for the whole world. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martin >> >> >> Well these are plots/property limits. And I dont want to import them for >> the whole world, just the streets that I am tracing buildings from so that >> I can quickly find locations. Also did you notice that >> http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ can now find house numbers accurately >> for these streets I imported : >> >> http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search.php?q=2033+Southwest+Wanamaker+Rd%2C+Topeka%2C+Kansas&viewbox=-217.97%2C80.28%2C217.97%2C-70.31 >> >> Until the houses are traced and the data transfered like i did here : >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/196582551 I removed the plot and >> the lbcs data and left only the house itself. >> I forgot the landuse=residential. >> >> -- >> James Michael DuPont >> Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org >> Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion >> http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com >> Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org >> Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3 >> Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3 > > > > > -- > James Michael DuPont > Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org > Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com > Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org > Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3 > Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3 > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us