On Jan 6, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Mike N <nice...@att.net> wrote: > On 1/6/2013 11:37 AM, Mike N wrote: >> I like the idea of a TIGER 07 vs 12 comparison only being used as a >> trigger. If you compare TIGER 12 vs OSM, it will highlight all the >> TIGER 07 artifact roads that were removed because they were in error or >> no longer exist, but are still often in TIGER 12 even after a geometry >> refresh. > > On second thought, you'd need a 3-way compare to further exclude new TIGER 12 > features that have already been added to OSM.
More data to process but an overlay/intersect approach could still work for ZL 10+. > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us Alex Barth http://twitter.com/lxbarth tel (+1) 202 250 3633 _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
