Thanks to Martijn and others for their input. I'll share my presentation via 
slideshare once completed.

Please continue to share your insights :)

Kind Regards,

Frederic


________________________________
 From: Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org>
To: Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net> 
Cc: OSM US Talk <talk-us@openstreetmap.org> 
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] OSM Data Quality
 


As already noted, quality is in the eye of the beholder. That said, there are 
some objective quality indicators such as positional accuracy, completeness, 
resolution. I summarized this in a paper a few years ago from another source, 
where I also introduced the notion of 'crowd quality' in an academic attempt to 
capture specific quality considerations for crowdsourced geospatial data: 
http://www.giscience2010.org/pdfs/paper_213.pdf 


Not much of an academic, I later picked this up in a more pragmatic manner to 
create the notion of data temperature I presented at SOTM US 2011: 
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/taking-the-temperature-of-local-openstreetmap-communities/


Someone else mentioned we need more mappers. There is truth to that but we also 
need to care about building out the community: how do we reduce the churn rate, 
or in other words how to keep mappers involved and motivated to continue 
mapping? how do we nurture the power mappers, those 5% who create 80% or more 
of the map data - especially in light of the large amounts of new mappers 
coming in? and finally how do we make local communities work? Latter is super 
important because great local data (transit, businesses, addresses) is key to 
the usefulness (hey, another way of thinking about quality!) of OSM. Great 
local data is something you only get if folks who know a place, folks with 
different interests and from different walks of life, work on the map together. 
Currently that happens in too few places. I think one of the most important 
keys to making good OSM data great lies in figuring out how to build strong 
local communities. In Europe, we have that
 down.It all started with that. Get together and map. Have fun, figure it out 
together. While traveling in Germany recently, I did not have to go online once 
to find my way, my hotel, restaurant, bus stop etc. The map is *that good*. 
Sure, there are more mappers per sqm there. But it is just as much about people 
getting together, motivating each other, collaborating on more complex mapping 
tasks (stuff like transit relations[1]). We have a long way to go still in the 
US, and we may need a different approach than Europe.


I think I just wrote half of one of my SOTM US talk. Thanks Frederic ;)


hth
Martijn

[1] http://www.overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?network=VBB&ref=M1&operator=




On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net> wrote:

On 5/31/13 3:15 PM, Frederic Julien wrote:
>
>Dear all,
>>
>>I'm working on a presentation and interested to hear your thoughts. What are 
>>the top 2-3 changes that could improve OSM data quality? That could be 
>>processes, tools, methods, training, peer review, attributes, etc.
>>
>>
at one level, i agree with Clifford Snow's comment that first you need
>to define data quality.
>
>at another level, i think that we can talk about the following:
>
>1) consistency in tagging. editor improvements, better documentation, better
>    training materials can all help with this
>
>2) improved processes and controls for data import (this is work that is 
>happening
>    on the US import committee). there are a lot of imports of the past that 
>suffer
>    from Quality Control issues, and lots of imports that never should have 
>been
>    done because of problems with the data quality.
>
>3) in the US (and you did ask on talk-us), identifying and dealing with the 
>shaky
>    Tiger data from the 2007 tiger import. some of this has been done, but 
>it's an
>    ongoing effort and is one of those things that is easier to say than it is 
>to do
>
>richard
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>Talk-us mailing list
>Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>


-- 
Martijn van Exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
http://openstreetmap.us/ 
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to