On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Frederic Julien <fjulie...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> Dear all, > I'm working on a presentation and interested to hear your thoughts. What > are the top 2-3 changes that could improve OSM data quality? That could be > processes, tools, methods, training, peer review, attributes, etc. > Peer review is definitely a candidate.... ...but not for the reason you might expect. Sure it might catch the occasional bad quality edit. But the real goal of peer review would be to draw mappers into community. Make it feel like a shared effort. Have mappers feel they are responsible and connected to other mappers. Share the love, get recognized for your effort, be social about it.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
