I would expect tracks to be in play except when explicitly excluding unpaved roads, barring surface tags to the contrary, otherwise as a last resort. Much of the US doesn't pave county roads, yet they're often packed and graded to the point someone with a low slung sedan can safely do 45 on them. On Jul 1, 2014 3:37 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Il giorno 01/lug/2014, alle ore 23:15, Jason Remillard < > remillard.ja...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > For example, scout does > > not route over highway=tracks, unless you are in pedestrian mode. It > > seems like a reasonable decision, perhaps all of the routers do this, > > > no, some routers do use tracks for car routing (I'd expect a router to use > tracks for cars, but only as a last resort when there are no alternatives) > > In your original post you mentioned path and cycleway, those should indeed > not route cars > > > > but the wiki documentation says nothing of the sort, and it surprised > > me. > > > I'd file a bug at scout and see what they respond, you should definitely > not adapt osm data based on one router > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
