On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Alex Barth <a...@mapbox.com> wrote: > Here's a map showing where TIGER is better than OSM: > > https://api.tiles.mapbox.com/v4/lxbarth.647bc246/page.html?access_token=pk.eyJ1IjoibHhiYXJ0aCIsImEiOiJFVXdYcUlvIn0.bbaHTEWlnAwGgyVwJngMdQ#5/39.724/-99.360 >
I think the correct phrase is "Here's a map showing where TIGER is different than OSM." Just because new TIGER data is available, doesn't make it better. In my limited experience with just small parts of two states, new TIGER data in rural areas is often bad. Clifford -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
