SteveA wrote: > Richard (Fairhurst), if cycle.travel/map's router logic is not > paying attention to surface= tags, perhaps it should, as > doing so truly can improve selected routes
It very much does - it'll look at surface=, and failing that tracktype= or smoothness=, as one of the principal criteria for "how cyclable is this?". I've suffered on too many bumpy dirt paths in my time to let that one past! cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/cycle-travel-US-bike-routing-and-unreviewed-rural-TIGER-tp5848084p5848239.html Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
