* Jack Burke <burke...@gmail.com> [2015-06-22 08:32 -0400]: > On June 22, 2015 2:46:36 AM EDT, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote: > >> tiger:reviewed=no > > > >Most of the well reviewed Tiger I see still has this tag. > >People don't know to delete it. > > Usually I change it to =yes instead of just deleting it. The main reason > is I frequently use ITOworld maps to review the county I live in to find > unreviewed roads, and I like the color pattern better that way.
Hm. Maybe I'll start doing that. I also use tiger:reviewed=position to signify that I've armchair-mapped the way to align with aerial imagery but haven't yet been out to verify the road name. (Details about my use of this tag are in this diary entry: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/asciiphil/diary/16247 ) -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- NOTICE: Anyone seen smoking will be assumed to be on fire and will be summarily put out. ---- --- -- _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
