> On May 21, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Lars Ahlzen <l...@ahlzen.com> wrote: > > On 05/20/2016 10:58 PM, Richard Welty wrote: >> On 5/20/16 9:24 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: >>> I was just on TopOSM [1] which appears to be very outdated. Does >>> anyone know who maintains this site? >>> >>> [1] http://toposm.ahlzen.com/ >> lars ahlzen maintains it. not sure if he's still monitoring this list >> closely or not. > > I do. It's pretty out of date indeed. > > TopOSM was never rendered on-the-fly. It's just a (very large) set of static > tiles (currently hosted by Stamen). To update it I'd have to either re-render > and upload the entire set, or improve it until it can be rendered in real > time. I was working on the latter [1] but never quite finished it. > > There's already the OSM cycle map which has a lot of the same features, > though with a slightly different focus. I guess one advantage of something > like toposm is that it can use higher-resolution data from sources like USGS, > and uses US conventions for things like units, symbols and other cartographic > details. > > Would it be would be worth picking it up again? > > - Lars > > [1] https://github.com/Ahlzen/TopOSM2 > >
I like the style used to generate it and if it were current as far as OSM data would use it and recommend it to others. Thanks! -Tod
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
